Fwd: Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace

Received: from web13906.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.69] by mail3.wilhelp.com
  (SMTPD32-7.07) id A5C61A11007E; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:44:06 -0500
Message-ID: <20020618234400.76316.qmail@web13906.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [24.208.128.62] by web13906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:44:00 PDT
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Terrence Jones <joebobbrigg@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace
To: taylor@wilhelp.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-RCPT-TO: <taylor@wilhelp.com>
Status: R
X-UIDL: 309601204

I thought I'd forward this entire bunch of obtuse shit
to you (including the headers) for your information. I
hate cowards who send hate e-mail without the balls to
use their name with it, so do with it as you may wish.
I hope you fuck them over with it, personally.

 Joe Bob




>From bobL Wed Jun 12 18:09:22 2002 
 
X-Apparently-To: joebobbrigg@yahoo.com via
web13906.mail.yahoo.com; 12 Jun 2002 18:08:10 -0700
(PDT) 
 
Return-Path: <znar@remailer.hotfire.net> 
 
Received: from io-cox.cox-internet.com (EHLO
io.cox-internet.com) (208.180.118.41) by
mta404.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2002 18:08:09
-0700 (PDT) 
 
Received: from Compaq ([208.180.144.28]) by
io.cox-internet.com (InterMail vK.4.03.05.03
201-232-132-103 license
180e1de7f543f89455b24e508f9cca39) with SMTP id
<20020613010555.GEZE7217.io@Compaq> for
<joebobbrigg@yahoo.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:05:55
-0500 
 
To: joebobbrigg@yahoo.com 
 
Date: 13 Jun 2002 01:09:22 -0000 
 
Message-ID: <7WZB3A6537419.839837963@anonymous.poster>

 
From: "bobL" <00003122@no-id.com> | Block Address  |
Add to Address Book 
 
Subject: Info. on "Just Taylor" AKA S. Wallace 
 
Comments: This message did not originate from the
above address. It was automatically remailed by one or
more anonymous mail services. This service is free.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
address below. 
 
Content-Length: 6319 
 
         
 


"Just Taylor" IS Spamford Wallace!!

Here is information on the person known as 'Just
Taylor' who stalks
people he does not know into newsgroups he does not
participate in
to harass and defame people for others.  He goes by a
real alias.
There is NO "Taylor Jimenez" in California.  He uses
abuse domains
and always posts off the record to further try to hide
and avoid
accountability.  He is a triple anon coward.  There is
a Sanford
Wallace and he posts from the same area as "Taylor". 
"Taylor" uses
the same words (like 'larting'); behaves in the same
way as Sanford;
uses some of Sanford's domains (which he claims he
"bought from him");
and he is the very same age and looks exactly the same
as Sanford
Wallace!!  Sanford Wallace no longer lives at his past
addresses and
there is a Sanford Wallace in San Pablo, CA.  He lives
in the same area
that would be served by the mail server "taylor" uses.
 "Taylor" also
retaliated for  Sanford in ten different newsgroups
where the "open
letter" (below) was posted.  I wonder why he would do
that???

In short it is clear that "Taylor" who is an
irresponsible 
criminal-type
staling and harassing abuser who tries to remain
unaccountable and
anonymous is indeed Sanford "Spamford" Wallace.

See the
http://www.concentric.net/~cyberper/jimenez_wallace.htm
page. 
As you can see, UNLIKE "Taylor", his critics
  go by my name and use a properly registered domain
space
(registered in the name of the Jesness family for 6
years now) to host
his web pages.  They are not cowards and a
psychopathic type who is
anon and uses falsely registered domains, like
"Taylor".

Here is more info to get you up-to-date on this
disgusting person.
Quoting past posts in response to the apparent
stalking and harassment
done BY Sanford Wallace.

An Open Letter to Sanford Wallace!


Sanford, it is obvious that you have gone to some
lengths to protect
your privacy. I respect a person's privacy. But, I
question
whether a person who harasses and abuses people in
newsgroups he
has never even participated in deserves to remain
unaccountable. It is
also questionable whether a person who provides
services to others
(hypocritical others) so they can harass people should
remain
unaccountable, even if your own personal posting
stops. These others
you perform services for have demanded (successfully)
that the very
sort of activities you do for them not occur or cease.
They officially
have considered activities like you do and facilitate
"stalking and
harassment". (It is possible you do not even know this
because
you do not know the interactions that have occurred in
the newsgroup
you abuse for and now abuse in! Afterall you have
provided services
for several years to a newsgroup you just recently
have appeared in
ONLY to finally do your own off-topic spam, stalking
and harassment.
You do not know the newsgroup just as you do not know
the people you
abuse.)

Here's the deal. You, Sanford Wallace, cease and
desist with ALL
activities stalking, harassing, and abusing people and
cease all
activity that facilitates and encourages harassment of
individuals
promptly and your privacy will continue to be
respected. Simply do
NOTHING for the others you presently "serve" that THEY
would not
label as inappropriate (to say the least) IF that was
done against
them. It is pathetic to see a person on a power trip,
where
he does things for others because he can get away with
it. Again, you
may have not even been involved enough in any
interactions with the
person you harass and with those in the newsgroup you
"serve" to
know that all you do would officially and definitely
be considered
wrong by many of those same hypocritical people you
serve (AND
SUCH ACTIVITIES _HAVE BEEN_ DECLARED WRONG BY THESE
VERY PEOPLE). True,
some of the people you "serve" (as basically a cheap
big-shot punk)
are happy to see YOU do what they would not do
themselves because
they do not want to be seen doing wrong, yet like it
when you do it.
Hopefully, this is not enough pathetic gratification
for you to
continue (esp. given there will be consequence and NOT
the sort you
have been hoping for). (I know how you love court and
like to win
when YOU have been a supreme asshole, but that wish
may not be
forthcoming. This is your record and what makes you
such a disgusting
punk for the whole world. This is why Harvard voted
you one of the
worst people on the earth. There ARE other possible
consequences --
and whoever told you that you are "smart" was very
mistaken.)

If you decide that it is more important for you to
throw your
"weight" around by doing favors for people to be a big
shot (punk)
and if you continue acting against people you do not
know and in
newsgroups you do not participate in, I believe that
it will be
fair to do anything to make you have more
accountability. This
will include revealing any and all identifying
information about you.
Since you have gone to some lengths to seek privacy, I
believe this
is something you might not want to occur.

Things have gone forward to the point that it is no
longer helpful
to you to post through an abuse domain to do your
Usenet posting and
it no longer helps that you go by an alias of a person
that does
not even exist (as you yourself have admitted you do).
You speak
often like a greedy materialistic man who has money
and likes to
throw that around for his punk-ass power trips. But
you also have
your family and your privacy to consider. I suggest
you stop abusing
other people and continue to keep your privacy. No one
wants to take
that away from you. But, you also would have to become
accountable
by all means, if you continue your stalking and
harassment of people
you do not even know, in newsgroups you do not even
participate in.

You have facilitated and participated in harassing
activities for
years. You can still get a free pass (believe it or
not). But this
offer shall expire very shortly. I'll give you a week
to correct
your activities and get your activities in line with
the standards
that those you serve have insisted on.


AND

THE Sanford Wallace's History of Abuse


The Internet’s most notorious spammer, Sanford Wallace
of Cyber 
Promotions,
Inc., and other bulk e-mailers have been accused of
spoofing addresses,
cloaking headers, and sending out millions of
scattershot e-mails for 
various
schlocky schemes and products. Now the evidence
indicates that the 
pathetic
abuser gets his "power trips" kicks from trying to
control or extort 
people
on Usenet to do what he says or what his friends say
(SOooo _low_ has 
he
apparently sunk for 'power' and 'admiration').
Although (to gain 
acceptance
and respectability) this jackass supposedly "turned
against spammers" 
*, he still
apparently loves to stretch the law and regulations
and common sense 
decency
_JUST_ to continue to practice ABUSE (or what even the
majority of his 
sick
supporters on Usenet would _AND HAVE_ labeled abuse).
He does this to
people he does not know and for people he does not
know. Just does what 
he can
get away with for power and praise (from sick
misguided others). SICK, 
SICK,
SICK, SICHO, PSYCHOPATH.

NO ONE SHOULD EVER CONSIDER DOING BUSINESS WITH
SANFORD WALLACE!!! He 
is not
a decent person. Let him live off the money he already
made through
his disgusting "business" activities and let him rot
in hell. He will 
go
broke and the fat slimeball will go to hell. He is
fat, ugly, and 
useless.

A bit of the abuser's pathetic history is in order:
Quoting 
http://www.phillipsnizer.com/int-art37.htm:

"CompuServe Incorporated v. Cyber Promotions, Inc and
Sanford Wallace. 
,
Case No. C2-96-1070 (S.D. Ohio, Feb. 3, 1997)(Graham,
J.) In this case, 
the
court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining
defendants, inter alia, 
from
sending unsolicited advertisements via e-mail to any
CompuServe 
subscriber.
Defendants are engaged in the business of sending
unsolicited "junk e-
mail"
to users. On the net, this practice is referred to as
"spamming." 
Amongst
others, defendants sent their advertisements to
subscribers of 
CompuServe.
To effectuate such communications, defendants utilized
CompuServe's 
computer
network, where the unsolicited e-mail was stored, and
the subscriber 
informed
of its arrival. Subscribers thereafter had the ability
to access this 
mail.
Numerous subscribers complained that they did not want
to receive this
e-mail. As a result, and because the volume of e-mail
sent by 
defendants
placed a significant burden on plaintiff's computer
equipment (which 
has
a finite processing and storage capacity), CompuServe
demanded that
defendants stop sending any further e-mail. CompuServe
also took
technological steps to prevent defendants' e-mail from
reaching its
clientele. Defendants refused to voluntarily cease
sending the e-mail,
and took steps to evade the technological blocks
CompuServe had put in
place. As a result, CompuServe commenced suit,
seeking, inter alia,
injunctive relief to prevent defendants from sending
any further
unsolicited e-mail. The court held that defendants'
conduct constituted
the tort of trespass to personal property or chattels.
[snip] ...

..the court stated: "To the extent that defendants'
multitudinous
electronic mailings demand the disk space and drain
the processing 
power
of plaintiff's computer equipment, those resources are
not available to
serve CompuServe subscribers. Therefore, the value of
that equipment to
CompuServe is diminished ...". The court further held
that the 
requirements
of section 218(d) were met by the injury to
CompuServe's goodwill and
reputation to with its subscribers, who objected to
the receipt of
unsolicited e-mail. ." (source:
http://www.phillipsnizer.com/int-
art37.htm)
 (end quote)


In short:
The court also rejected Cyber's claims that
CompuServe's decision to
connect to the Internet was an implied invitation to
the public to 
enter
its property for business purposes. The court held
that CompuServe's
demand, in October 1995, that Cyber cease the
e-mailings was sufficient
withdrawal of any implied invitation. Also:

Other cases brought against Cyber and its president,
Sanford Wallace by
Internet service providers have produced similar
results. In Concentric
Network Corp. v Wallace, the U.S. District Court for
the Northern
District of California granted Concentric Network
(CNC) a permanent
injunction prohibiting Cyber from 1) sending
unsolicited e-mail to CNC
subscribers; 2) sending or receiving e-mail via CNC;
3) misrepresenting
that any Cyber e-mail message was sent from or
condoned by CNC; and 4)
distributing mailing lists containing the e-mail
addresses of CNC
subscribers. In EarthLink v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.,
the
Los Angeles Superior Court granted EarthLink an
injunction prohibiting
Cyber from sending unsolicited e-mail to EarthLink
subscribers. The
court determined that Cyber's actions constituted
trespass to 
EarthLink's
computer systems. (sourse:
http://www.info-law.com/lost.html)

*Footnote: SW apparently has not even been able to
curb his 
psychopathic
tendencies to stop spamming (in one way or another).
Although he uses
SEVERAL email addresses and posting services, some of
his names and
email addresses appear on over *** 70 *** Usenet spam
reports!! He is
simply a sick psycho. Whatever spam he no longer
engages in is likely
JUST because in recent court case(s), he has been
prohibited BY LAW 
from
continuing his activity.

Regarding this, quoting another source speaking about
the
outcome of the case between Spamford and Earthlink:
...
"The decision also prohibits Cyber Promotions and its
founder, Sanford 
Wallace,
from engaging in a comprehensive list of spam-related
activities in the
future." In addition to the $2 million settlement,
EarthLink said 
Wallace
agreed to be held personally liable for $1 million if
he sends spam to
EarthLink members or enables anyone else to spam them.
Wallace also 
will be
held liable if he violates a number of other
restrictions, including
distribution of EarthLink member e-mail addresses.

Since last year, Cyber Promotions has lost legal
battles with America 
Online
and Bigfoot, a company that provides e-mail addresses.

Cyber Promotions has virtually been out of business
since October
when Agis, its backbone Internet service provider,
terminated Cyber
Promotions' connection. "
(source:
http://money.cnn.com/1998/03/30/technology/earthlink/)

IN SHORT, SANFORD WALLACE IS A WORTHLESS PATHETIC
LOSER, who can kiss 
my
ass. HIS RECENT ACTIVITIES JUST SHOW HIM TO BE A WORSE
LOSER THAN 
ANYONE
WOULD HAVE EXPECTED. MANY WHO THOUGHT SANFORD HAD SOME
INTELLECTUAL
CAPACITY NOW SEE HIM AS A PSYCHOPATHIC MORON.

NOW Why Sanford Wallace quit email spam!!:


ONLY ONE REASON: _NOT_ BECAUSE HE IS REFORMED!! **HE
IS PROHIBITED BY A
COURT FROM DOING EMAIL SPAM.*** THIS IS THE ONLY
REASON THE UNREFORMED
ABUSER HIDES AND ABUSES SECRETLY AND DOES NOT DO EMAIL
SPAM. HE STILL
IS AN ABUSER AND A SPAMMER OF SORTS AND HE IS A LOSER
PSYCHOPATH WHO 
CANNOT
KEEP FROM ABUSING PEOPLE.

SW apparently has not even been able to curb his
psychopathic
tendencies to stop spamming (in one way or another).
Although he uses
SEVERAL email addresses and posting services, some of
his names and
email addresses appear on over *** 70 *** Usenet spam
reports!! He is
simply a sick psycho. Whatever spam he no longer
engages in is likely
JUST because in recent court case(s), he has been
prohibited BY LAW 
from
continuing his activity.

Regarding this, quoting another source speaking about
the
outcome of the case between Spamford and Earthlink:
...
"The decision also prohibits Cyber Promotions and its
founder, Sanford 
Wallace,
from engaging in a comprehensive list of spam-related
activities in the
future." In addition to the $2 million settlement,
EarthLink said 
Wallace
agreed to be held personally liable for $1 million if
he sends spam to
EarthLink members or enables anyone else to spam them.
Wallace also 
will be
held liable if he violates a number of other
restrictions, including
distribution of EarthLink member e-mail addresses.

Since last year, Cyber Promotions has lost legal
battles with America 
Online
and Bigfoot, a company that provides e-mail addresses.

Cyber Promotions has virtually been out of business
since October
when Agis, its backbone Internet service provider,
terminated Cyber
Promotions' connection. "
(source:
http://money.cnn.com/1998/03/30/technology/earthlink/)

The Internet’s most notorious spammer, Sanford Wallace
of Cyber 
Promotions,
Inc., and other bulk e-mailers have been accused of
spoofing addresses,
cloaking headers, and sending out millions of
scattershot e-mails for 
various
schlocky schemes and products. Now the evidence
indicates that the 
pathetic
abuser gets his "power trips" kicks from trying to
control or extort 
people
on Usenet to do what he says or what his friends say
(SOooo _low_ has 
he
apparently sunk for 'power' and 'admiration').
Although (to gain 
acceptance
and respectability) this jackass supposedly "turned
against spammers" 
*, he still
apparently loves to stretch the law and regulations
and common sense 
decency
_JUST_ to continue to practice ABUSE (or what even the
majority of his 
sick
supporters on Usenet would _AND HAVE_ labeled abuse).
He does this to
people he does not know and for people he does not
know. Just does what 
he can
get away with for power and praise (from sick
misguided others). SICK, 
SICK,
SICK, SICKO, PSYCHOPATH.

IN SHORT, SANFORD WALLACE IS A WORTHLESS PATHETIC
LOSER, who can kiss 
my
ass. HIS RECENT ACTIVITIES JUST SHOW HIM TO BE A WORSE
LOSER THAN 
ANYONE
WOULD HAVE EXPECTED. MANY WHO THOUGHT SANFORD HAD SOME
INTELLECTUAL
CAPACITY NOW SEE HIM AS A PSYCHOPATHIC MORON.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com