Re: Psychologists and APA together could NOT sue Brad!

Path: newssvr21.news.prodigy.com!newssvr13.news.prodigy.com!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!209.122.83.58!howland.erols.net!newspharm.inet.tele.dk.MISMATCH!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
From: Frog3 <FrogRemailer@bigfoot.com>
Date: 13 Feb 2002 16:42:54 -0000
Message-ID: <4J613TYT37300.738125@frog.gilgamesh.org>
Subject: Re: Psychologists and APA together could NOT sue Brad!
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
References: <b0644d6a23a4cdaec511ea744e663d90@paranoici.org>
X-No-Archive: yes
Comments: This message probably did not originate from the above address.
        It was automatically remailed by one or more anonymous mail services.
        You should NEVER trust ANY address on Usenet ANYWAYS: use PGP !!!
        Get information about complaints from the URL below
X-Remailer-Contact: http://www.privacyresources.org/frogadmin/
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Lines: 69
Xref: cyclone-sf.pbi.net sci.psychology.psychotherapy:90424

P.S.  I can guarantee that Brad would swear to all of this in 

a court of law.  Any "damage done to psychologists", they have 

done completely to themselves.  Go to court, and Brad would say, 

"SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!":



(repeat, here on)



It's true.  Not a single regularly participating psychologist from 

this newsgroup would ever want to appear in any court to testify. 



There is no way the court would fail to find out that virtually 

every regularly participating psychologist here is a totally unethical 

hood and rather quickly they would be able to determine that all the gross
misconduct was related to wanting to suppress certain facts. 



It would also not take long to show that all the hoods attacking Brad 

or his friends were befriended by psychologists and, in essense, 

solicited to do the abuse you have seen in this newsgroup for well over a 

year BY PSYCHOLOGISTS. Other abuses solicited by psychologists go back several
years -- testimony would also clearly establish this.  All was 

malicious defamation and involved intentional misrepresentations and 

baseless charges (and some lies).



Examining the more distant record of this newsgroup would show 

psychologists themselves engaging in personal malicious off-topic 

HARASSING response to ON-TOPIC posts (showing clear the motivation and 

link to the desire to suppress facts about the FIELD). This would 

include evidence that psychologists repeated false and unfounded 

accusations to do intentional defamation -- then the money would start 

flowing in Brad's direction VERY QUICKLY (and lots of it if the APA 

got involved).



If the poor poster "wanting to sue" is unfamiliar with these facts, 

a few days exploring google and going back over several years would 

show this very horror story I just described is 100% true and accurate.